Hi Stephen and all, (Sorry for the late reply)
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 08:36, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > On the compatibility interface; I'd rather just drop it and spend that > > effort on migration documentation. Does raise the question of whether > > the cli2 package name ever becomes cli. Having it as cli2 does avoid > > any surprises; things flat out won't work. > > Or [commons-commandline], a completely 'new' commons project. I think that we have a better chance of getting newer versions of CLI out to developers if we keep it within the current project. Take the Debian libcommons-cli-java package: Debian will much more readily accept new upstream releases of the same package than they will the same project under a new name (I think). > Stephen Regards, James -- James Ring
pgpJd1Jns24AW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
