--- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2/16/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Craig: thanks for your quick reply. My (possibly > > naive) impression was that you would specify > > DynaBean's get(String) and set(String, Object) > > methods... :) Now, tell me why that won't work as > > expected. ;) > > > Because a tool like Java Studio Creator (my day job > is architect for this) > is going to assume that these methods conform to the > JavaBeans design > patterns for properties ... a getter that takes zero > arguments, and a setter > that takes one argument (the value). Trying to use > these methods will cause > the tool's reflective get or set call to fail > because the argument types and > counts won't match.
Doh! Plain as can be. I tend to ignore these little rules regarding settors/gettors on beans, and here's the proof. So instantly what was simple becomes extremely complex! :) Ouch. Can't think of any slick way around that off the top of my head... and I assume I'm not the first, then. Thanks, Matt > > -Matt > > > Craig > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
