> Von: Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Boris Unckel wrote: > > To turn Log into an abstract class means that no native implementation > will > > ever be possible. It would definitly mean that you will need an wrapper > > class. Currently there is just x4juli supporting native JCL support for > > java.util.logging (X4JuliLogger extends jul.Logger implements JCL). > > But this is also a chance for log4j2. > > What do you mean by "native" implementation ? Do you mean a multiple > inheritance to implement the Log type from JCL and the Logger type from > java.util.logging ? Yes: X4JuliLogger extends jul.Logger implements JCL
Have a look at: http://svn.berlios.de/viewcvs/x4juli/trunk/src/java/org/x4juli/X4JuliLogger.java?view=markup Regards Boris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
