On 3/2/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would have to agree that the release process is a bit daunting. That's > why I haven't released Commons Proxy 1.0 yet. I really don't know how to do > all of that stuff on the release preparation document (md5 signatures and > the like). > <snip/>
Is that really the only reason? With [proxy] (and [scxml] as well), one of the glaring reasons I see is that they're still in sandbox. We *couldn't* release them right now, irrespective of how daunting the task of cutting a release may be. I'd say, its different. -Rahul > -----Original Message----- > From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:07 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status > > On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton > > and Feedparser > > > > http://tailrank.com/code.php > > > > Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF. > > > <snip/> > > That appears to be the perception, if so, its unfortunate. Generally > speaking, if the "procedures" and "awareness of procedures" vectors > don't reasonably align, the tug of war hurts momentum. > > -Rahul > > > > Niall > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
