Now answering on the new thread with less spelling errors :) Henri Yandell wrote on Friday, March 03, 2006 6:40 AM:
> Re-subjecting this - bit hidden under the old subject. > > On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2/27/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> If we start to add m2 poms to SVN I do think we should use the >>> Maven 2 way to declare groupId, like this: >>> >>> <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId> >>> <artifactId>commons-daemon</artifactId> >> >> I think it should be: org.apache.jakarta.commons >> >> It's not the package (afaik), just a grouping, so let's get it right >> at the ASF this time. > > Suggesting on repository@ that we lock things down so that PMCs have > group space into which only they can write etc etc - either through > SVN or unix groups. It is the recommended way to chose the package name as group id. If Jakartea wouldn't have an own mirror into the repo at ibiblio, your upload would been refused by the Maven team. And IMHO it is a good practice, because the user must not guess about an arbitrary chosen groupId by the developers of a package. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
