On 3/3/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/4/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > So.... what's the plan? > > > > > > Currently Brett has the beginnings of a migration (read: all the hard > > > work) in the commons-sandbox. It looks good, and I'm very impressed > > > with the apt site system. > > > > > > Obviously continuing with sandbox makes sense; but how to do it? > > > > > > If it just got migrated, how long would we need the old maven-1 stuff > > > to stay? Just long enough for us to vote on a migration? > > > > That depends on what our demands are. Do we require that all Maven 2 > > plugins that we use must be released? > > > +1. Given what I see on a daily basis on the maven users list, using > anything but a released plugin makes m2 more fragile and unstable.
Very +1. Getting in the situation where people have to do odd things to build code and site is not something we want to get into again (it's where we are with m1). Making it easy for people to get involved needs to be a big priority for us, else we'll starve; and if we don't make it easy for a new component to follow the rules and use the same structure, they won't follow the rules. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
