On 3/3/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/3/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, seems Maven 2 picks up the xdoc one first. We should probably > > discuss if we want to standardise on one or the other doc format prior > > to doing too much more work on the migration. > > > If you decide to standardise on what we have now, I'm right with you. If you > want to standardise on a new format, and therefore require all components to > switch to something else, then I'm very likely outta here. I have better > things to spend my time on than learning a new format when what we have > works just fine.
Two problems with our Maven-1 build: 1) Maven-1.0.2 is not the latest version from the Maven community, so there's the support question etc. Not a huge problem - we're stable build-wise etc and don't need new things. 2) I contend it doesn't work fine. We use some bizarre group of non-1.0.2 plugins, and getting the site working is a pain in the arse. Some of the questions are not about our build system. A group id of org.apache.jakarta.commons is more about the maven-2 repository and how it stores our jars - and what the foundation policy is. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
