Another one: org.apache.jakarta
no commons. With my different hats/mental viewpoints: * Foundation: We need to have an organizing, pmc based structure. * Jakarta: We need a single top grouping for Jakarta * Commons: We need a grouping for Commons * Jakarta: I want to merge Commons and Jakarta, so can drop one * Foundation: commons.apache.org means painful arguments, prefer jakarta. These multiple inputs are why I'm trying to get this resolved right now, regardless of short-term pain. Hen On 3/3/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say o.a.j.c, but really it doesn't matter. Pick one and use it > consistently. > > If you use o.a.c, you will have to share with anything else "commons" at > Apache. Same deal that has been traded off for the Java package before. > It's really not a big deal. > > - Brett > > Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> On 2/27/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Alex Karasulu wrote: > >>>> Hiya, > >>>> > >>>> The directory project depends on commons-daemon 1.0.1 and we had to > >>>> update the maven2 repo with a temporary pom.xml to allow our recent > >>>> release to go through. I wanted to contact this list and make sure the > >>>> deployed pom is correct. It is located here: > >>>> > >>>> http://test.maven.codehaus.org/maven2/commons-daemon/commons-daemon/1.0.1/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Also I'd like to make sure we can get m2 deployments working for > >>>> commons > >>>> daemon from now on. I'm a committer but I wanted to ask if it's ok to > >>>> add a m2 pom alongside the m1 project.xml so we can update the m2 > >>>> repository. > >>> If we start to add m2 poms to SVN I do think we should use the Maven 2 > >>> way to declare groupId, like this: > >>> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>commons-daemon</artifactId> > >> > >> I think it should be: org.apache.jakarta.commons > >> > >> It's not the package, just a grouping, so let's get it right at the > >> ASF this time. > > > > This page [1] says to use the package, but I have taken this question > > over to [email protected] [2] to get this clarified. Will post the > > result back here later. > > > > <snip/> > > > > > > [1]http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html > > [2]http://www.nabble.com/What-M2-groupId-should-we-use-in-Jakarta-commons--t1220408.html > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
