On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we establish the status of [resources]. > > > > Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > * [resources] Since now it isn't part of Struts 1.3.0, seems thats a > > > setback to interest in releasing. > > > > IFAIK: > > - its unreleased > > - there is little development effort (although something happened in > > November) > > - there could be a overlap with [configuration] > > - its raison d'etre seems to have disappeared > > > > > > Does a [resources] developer want to speak up in its favour? > > Or should we fast track it to dormant? > > Just to confirm - this means putting it back into the sandbox, right?
Um, no, I believe "fast track it to dormant" means moving it to "dormant". I know that the web site currently describes "dormant" as inactive sandbox components, but that is not accurate. FeedParser was promoted before it went dormant, and Resources is in the same boat. The web site is wrong - dormant components can come from Proper too. -- Martin Cooper Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
