Phil Steitz wrote:
I am +1 on the style stuff. By all means, lets get rid of
commons-site.jsl. If you personally are OK with the l&f that you can
get, this will probably be fine, since IIRC, you were the one with
reservations in the past on just using the maven classic syle. That
will get rid of the xdoc 1.9.2 requirement. Can you post an example?
See http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/
Its pretty close to the current commons site
The menus is giving me a little hesitation, though I want to support
the completely independent builds objective. Maybe we can just agree
to duplicate the basic stuff into the individual navs.
Possibly. Prefer not to though. Robert indicated he had an idea too. For
now, commons-io will still use commons-build for the live website, but
not for that in the download (which is a pain as it requires fiddling
with the fles)
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
