On 3/27/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some suggestions for the checklist: > > * 3rd party jars and licences > * do the MD5 and PGPs work OK? > * do the archives contain everything that is needed? For example, if > there are source and binary jars, then the union of the two should > produce a set of files that includes everything in the repository. > * do the archives contain anything they shouldn't? E.g. unversioned > source files, test logs etc. > * if there are multiple archives, does each contain what is necessary > and sufficient, or is there some duplication that could be eliminated?
One more that bit us on Shale 1.0.1 ... can you successfully build the source distribution? HTH > S. Craig On 28/03/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone mind if I split the "Things To Look For When Inspecting A > > Release Candidate" section of > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html into its own > > page? > > > > And add in some bits about Phil's tools (I've been making > > modifications to them, hope you've been noticing Phil :) ). > > > > Hen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
