DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39207>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39207 Summary: SwitchTransformer doc/impl inconsistent Product: Commons Version: Nightly Builds Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: Collections AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TransformerUtils says that a null defaultTransformer will return null; this is consistent with the switchTransformer tests under TestTransformerUtils. However, the SwitchTransformer constructor's javadoc says that a null defaultTransformer means nop, which is incorrect. Not that it matters, but NOP would have been more intuitive IMHO, but what's done is done and passing NOPTransformer.INSTANCE or TransformerUtils.nopTransformer() is no big deal. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
