On 4/6/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :) > > > > we no long ship the jdk logger in API jar. however, tomcat uses jdk > > logger as it's default. so, by excluding the jdk logger, JCL 1.1 is no > > longer a drop in replacement at least for tomcat. > > > > so, i thought it'd be a good time to reconsider the decision to exclude > > the jdk logger. > > > > opinions? > > > > - robert > > I think we should allow for a smooth upgrade path, especially for Tomcat > users. If that means putting back the jdk logger, then let's do that.
-1 It's an API jar and should not include an implementation! Why doesn't tomcat use the full JCL jar? cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
