On 4/20/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was half kidding, but now that I think about it, it might not be such a > bad idea. The specification is called SCXML. The Apache implementation of > it should be distinguished in some way, IMHO. I mean, the Apache web server > isn't just called HTTP (although, the daemon is called httpd...hmmmmm). :-) > <snip/>
But we already can distinguish it. * EL / Commons EL * SCXML / Commons SCXML If you look through the user archives, the prefix Commons unambiguously qualifies the implementation. The advantage ofcourse, is if you google "scxml", the first hits are the W3C document, followed by the Commons impl. Priceless, IMO. Also, personally I dislike J*, *4J what have you. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
