On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 23:58 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > On 4/28/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I think that having a naming scheme is a good idea. From a user > >> standpoint I see no reason for keeping the project ids short (3-4 > >> characters). If Jakarta will be sharing the Jira instance with other ASF > >> projects then using a J prefix for Jakarta project should be used, like > >> this: > >> - JLANG > >> - JDIGESTER > >> - JCOLLECTIONS > >> - JHTTPCORE > > > > It does seem to be that there's more interest in the full name than > > the shorter one. > > > > In terms of the J***, we should we be asking infra@ what they want to do. > > If infra don't require us to use a prefix then we shouldn't use one. > Keep it as simple as possible, but still readable.
Folks, Then I will go ahead and try to scrap the existing project and create a new one with JHTTPCORE as the project id. Please complain loudly if you have any objections to that. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
