On 4/30/06, C. Grobmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
here is a new draft for the compress interface:
* http://grobmeier.de/commons-compress-draft-5.zip
My fault for only just joining in etc, but why have the underlying
Tar/Zip classes become package scoped? Does the bridging API replace
all need to dig into the lower-level APIs?
If so, why are the bzip classes still public?
Should there be ZipCompressor and GZipCompressor implementations?
Any reason for there not being an archiveToStream method? Especially
in the case of the Tar implementation where you'd want to attach a
TarArchiver to a GZipCompressor.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
