Paul, I had a quick look and I'm +1. On 6/3/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In maven 1.1 beta 3 we'll upgrade to dom4j 1.6.2 (not yet released) which fixes a problem with xml entities. Thus we are particularly in favor to upgrade your dependency in Jelly. It will limit incompabilities between us. arnaud On 6/2/06, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I please beg another round of review... or I'll interprete the silence > as "no bother" and will do... > > paul > > Hans Gilde wrote: > > +0 > > > > If the unit tests pass, I'm inclined to say that the latest version > should > > be used. But I have not tried it. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 5:06 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ? > > > > Hello Jellyers, > > > > After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j... > > I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1. > > Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in > many other places. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
