Author: bayard
Date: Wed Jun 7 10:21:48 2006
New Revision: 412456
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412456&view=rev
Log:
Modifying the test so it creates a new format object rather than reusing the
static one. For some reason it gives the wrong response and it's hard to see
why given that it works for other methods and JUnit is single threaded. This is
discussed in CLI-40
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2/validation/DateValidatorTest.java
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2/validation/DateValidatorTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2/validation/DateValidatorTest.java?rev=412456&r1=412455&r2=412456&view=diff
==============================================================================
---
jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2/validation/DateValidatorTest.java
(original)
+++
jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2/validation/DateValidatorTest.java
Wed Jun 7 10:21:48 2006
@@ -65,7 +65,10 @@
validator.validate(list);
final Iterator i = list.iterator();
- assertEquals("2003-12-23", YYYY_MM_YY.format((Date) i.next()));
+ // CLI-40: For some reason, the YYYY_MM_YY object gets quite
+ // confused here and returns 2003-12-22. If we make a new one
+ // there is no problem.
+ assertEquals("2003-12-23", new
SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd").format((Date) i.next()));
assertFalse(i.hasNext());
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
