>Commons-collections is too big. It was deliberately >broken out to make both parts managable.
>This project did have quite an active life at first. >Where it floundered was that there were IIRC three >competing code implementations (not just designs). I >believe that all are currently in SVN. To revive this, >we would have to select one without excessive ego. I'm not sure I'm looking at the same package. I see 25 classes, 30 tops. There doesn't seem to be any overlap (e.g. two concepts coded in competing ways). And when it's compiled, the jar is 35k. (less than 10% of commons-collections, which weighs in at 500k--and commons-events depends on commons-collections to boot). >I also believe that Michael Heuer may have released >something related on java.net? Cool. I'll go looking for it too. Bryce --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
