You would lose backwards compatibility with 1.3 and
1.4.
--- Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, you need to do this:
>
> List<Test> list = (List<Test>)
> BasicRowProcessor.instance().toBeanList(rs,
> Test.class);
>
> what about using generics?
>
> List<Test> list =
> BasicRowProcessor.instance().toBeanList(rs,
> Test.class);
>
> public static <T> List<T> toBeanList(
> ResultSet rs,
> Class<T> clazz) throws SQLException {
> return (List<T>) toBeanList(rs, clazz);
> }
>
> Of course this would be required for other cases as
> well. I'm not sure if you should create a new class
> or overwrite the existing class for the generic
> version. Maybe the Class<T> could be removed in some
> way (I'm not a generics expert).
>
> Thomas
>
> --
>
>
> Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
> "Feel free" mit GMX DSL!
> http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
