[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-87?page=comments#action_12423093
]
Niall Pemberton commented on IO-87:
-----------------------------------
IMO minimumSize and maximumSize indicate that both are "inclusive" and
therefore its unecessary to rename the parameters. I agree that the javadoc
could be clearer in the method description and will fix that. Something like
/**
* Returns a filter that accepts files whose size is <= minimum size
* and >= maximum size.
*/
Currently this method implementation adds 1 to the maximumSize specified to
achieve the <= maximum - but I've just opened a bug (IO-89) relating to the
inconsistency in SizeFileFilter (and AgeFileFilter) which it would be good to
resolve before fixing this.
> Provide a convenience mehod in FileFilterUtils to create a Size Range filter
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IO-87
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-87
> Project: Commons IO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Filters
> Affects Versions: 1.2
> Reporter: Niall Pemberton
> Assigned To: Niall Pemberton
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.3
>
>
> Provide a convenience mehod in FileFilterUtils to create a Size Range filter
> - by combining two SizeFileFilter's (one >= minimum and the other <= maximum)
> with an AndFileFilter
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
