For my part....
On 8/1/06, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for the name StrSubstitutor.
I'm ambivalent on the name. I've always called this introspecting, but
we killed that name a while back so I'll take anything.
Well, I guess I have no chance to convince you to get back to Object as
result type for the resolver interface? Hm, for [configuration] I can
probably live with this, but it may cause unnecessary conversions.
I can't see Objects working well in string substitution unless you add
the concept of formatting, and that takes us one step further down the
road to a full on velocity clone or some such.
${date:"hh:dd:mm"} or whatever.
Something to consider adding in a later release, but the basic
substitution is probably a good start.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
