On 8/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rahul! > m2 would be convenient, but it would also be a distraction. ;-) Its just with m2 I did this kind of stuff already, no clue with m1 - but yea, its time to learn again. Torsten pointed out a project where we can borrow this stuff, or are you familiar enough with m1?
<snip/> Thats [jci]. Even with m2, we will need magic to keep smb/webdav out of the release (if it was just the [compress] bits, we'd be done by now). Therefore IMO, the way to think of this is as if there were two components, vfs and vfs-sandbox, the latter depending on the former for the "core" API (which is why I mentioned another build run in vfs/trunk/sandbox in the nightlies script). -Rahul
> So, depends how soon we want to go for the first release (sooner the > better?). Now that you did all the compress stuff, we should really try to release before compress ;-) I'd restart the release cycle as soon as we setup the sandbox/ stuff and the nightly works with it. Ciao, Mario
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
