Daniel
I think most of the changes that were previously talked about re: [net]
were lower-level changes, like a change of threading or I/O model in
use. I think we could incorporate these changes in pretty seamlessly at
some stage, maybe by providing two underlying implementations of a
client class and allowing a user to select between them
R
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rory Winston writes:
OK, seeing as we have reached some kind of consensus on how to handle
backards-incompatible JDK releases, I'm restarting the vote for a
release of Commons::Net 2.0 (the JDK 5.0 branch).
+0
I was hoping to see more radical API and implementation changes in
Commons Net 2.0. But since I'm currently unable to contribute to
such changes, I'm giving a +0 primarily to indicate that I haven't
fallen off the planet.
daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
