It's a maven generated page though - so not something that is too desirable to mess with. From their point of view, someone could have Cobertura, Clover and JCoverage reports on the same page so you couldn't call each one of them "Test Coverage".
Hen On 9/27/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello: For the site, I think that under "Project Reports", the item "Cobertura" is a bad idea because it does not describe what "it" is but rather "how" it was created. I care to find the "Test Coverage" report but I do not need to know the particular technology that was used in the heading. 2c, Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:42 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [VOTE][lang] Commons Lang 2.2-rc3 > > Another try to get it right :) > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/ > > (ignoring the various javadoc symlinking I'll need to do before the > real site release) > > [ ] +1 > [ ] -1 > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
