Hi,
Nobody any comments should I file a bug report against JIRA?
Tom
Tom Schindl schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issue the current implementation of
>
> MethodUtils#getAccessibleMethod(Method) where it reads:
>
> ------------8<------------
> if( Modifier.isPublic(clazz.getModifiers()) ) {
>
> }
>
> // Check the implemented interfaces and subinterfaces
> ------------8<------------
>
> With this check setting attributes on a class Hierarchy like the one
> below doesn't work:
>
> ------------8<------------
> class HiddenBean {
> private String a;
>
> protected HiddenBean() {
>
> }
>
> public void setA(String a) {
> this.a = a;
> }
>
> public String getA() {
> return this.a;
> }
> }
>
> public class PublicBean extends HiddenBean {
>
> }
> ------------8<------------
>
> The problem is that big framework like e.g. Eclipse often use
> package-visible classes to not expose too much API to the user and you
> can't use BeanUtils currently to set values.
>
> I came across this problem when trying to provide an enhanced version of
> XSWT which is not working in Eclipse 3.2 but not in 3.3 any more because
> of this.
>
> What would be the problem to change the check to the following:
>
> MethodUtils#getAccessibleMethod(Method):
> ------------8<------------
> if( ! Modifier.isPrivate(clazz.getModifiers()) && !
> Modifier.isPackage(clazz.getModifiers()) ) {
>
> }
> ------------8<------------
>
> PropertyUtilsBean#invokeMethod(...):
> ------------8<------------
> method.setAccessible(true);
> return method.invoke(bean,values);
> ------------8<------------
>
> I first wanted to discuss this here and not creating an bug immediately.
>
> Tom
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
