On 11/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:53 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > thanks to everyone who commented on RC1
> >
> > i've now cut an RC2 based on the feedback and uploaded the artifacts
> > (only) to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. please
> > check them.
> >
> > unless issues emerge, i'll finish off the process (javadocs, signatures
> > and so on) and move to a VOTE.
>
> no further reports so i'll move towards a vote soon
Sorry Robert, kept meaning to look at the rc, but not finding time -
couple of comments:
1) The "xdocs" are missing from the source distro
2) Adding "scope" elements to the xerces, xml-apis and junit
dependencies in the project.xml will probably help maven 2 downstream
users by not pulling in those dependencies
Really important catch.
3) Don't know why, but everyone seems to have changed mail archive
from eyebrowse
Eyebrowse be dead.
4) Add md5 checksums to the build would make creating the release easier.
Wouldn't for me :)
Been wondering about this as I've noticed it creeping in (nightly
build currently errors on md5s because it assumes components are
creating them and most don't).
Problem is that md5s are not made for the jar file or the pom file, so
you still have to make them for them. *nix wise, the multisign.sh
script in committers handles both the pgp and the md5, so I just use
that, but I know that's only a partial solution as it doesn't work on
Windows [or a bunch of *nixes I suspect due to md5 having different
implementations].
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]