On 12/11/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rahul! > No, tag remains VFS_1_0_RC9. Hmmm ... I don't understand why we still need the RC tags, if something is dangerous, than that we have artifacts with a release version numbering even if its not the real final release.
<snip/>
Correct, so to go with that the RCs should be low-key (dev list only). This thread [1] has more on that.
If we need a "pre stage" in svn, wouldn't it be sufficient to simply tag it with "VFS_1_0_RC" (without RC number)
<snap/> I don't have a strong opinion, I prefer a tag per RC since its cheap in SVN and is good for archival.
Anyway, since its much easier to relase that way, I'll do it for the next RC.
<snip/> Sounds good. -Rahul [1] http://tinyurl.com/sokb5
Thanks! Ciao, Mario
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
