Boris Unckel wrote:
Hi,
yet another issue.
<snip>
I had a look at the source and found XHTML transistional in the doctype.
Both http://validator.w3.org and http://www.validome.org say it is not
valid.
I think you know the tools, even when not, they are very easy to use (I
did not write: give good hint's for hunting the bugs).
Regards
Boris
This turned out to be trickier than I first thought, but here goes:
1. The xdocs for commons-lang are fine.
2. Rendering of links that include the &-character, even if they are
properly encoded as & in the xdoc source, seems to be broken. That
is the &-character doesn't get escaped properly, resulting in invalid
xhtml. This is filed as DOXIA-85 [1].
3. The rendered documents include a css link to "css/site.css" - a file
which doesn't exist, resulting in invalid css. This is filed as DOXIA-86
[2].
Anyway, this doesn't involve changing commons-skin.
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-85
[2] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-86
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
