Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 2/2/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do people think - update PROPOSALs or delete them?
Neither - leave it unchanged. It is historical and I think it is
obvious it is, many (most?) components have them and I've never seen
it raised as a cause for confusion.
<snap/>
Archival is good, I read proposals. But from trunk. One way to avoid
potential confusion is to not make it part of the distros, if indeed
it is added there.
I think the proposal should no longer be part of the website or distro,
but left unchanged in SVN. There may be a case for an updated scope doc
on the website (ie. a new xdoc).
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
