2.3-RC2 vote kicked off, so this vote is dead.
* The unit test below was changed to a warning.
* The proposal.html is no longer in the source.
* The sources.jar and javadoc.jar are in the binary.
* A couple of JIRA issues are dealt with.
Hen
On 2/1/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Correction: Tests did *not* run:
========= %< ============
$ ant
...
[junit] Tests run: 224, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,11 sec
test.time:
[junit] Running org.apache.commons.lang.time.TimeTestSuite
[junit] Tests run: 61, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8,094 sec
[junit] Test org.apache.commons.lang.time.TimeTestSuite FAILED
test:
[echo] Running tests ...
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
========= %< ============
Building with M1 fails therefore. Test report:
========= %< ============
Testsuite: org.apache.commons.lang.time.TimeTestSuite
Tests run: 61, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8,938 sec
Testcase: testLang312(org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateFormatUtilsTest):
FAILED
expected:<...9...> but was:<...8...>
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...9...> but was:<...8...>
at org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateFormatUtilsTest.testLang31
(DateFormatUtilsTest.java:230)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
========= %< ============
It's the part of the fixture that tests the JDK ... maybe this should not be
asserted and better be replaced by a simple sysout? In the end you cannot
know what was changed/fixed by Sun in which JDK version (and if the
assumption is valid for other JDKs) and it does not make sense to rely our
tests on such a behavior.
- Jörg
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> +1
>
> Rebuild from the src package with Sun JDK 5 under Linux.
>
> Minor: I understand that the proposal is a historical document, but it
> claims that c-lang is build on top of JDK 1.2 ... that might be confusing.
>
> - Jörg
>
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Next up - Lang 2.3.
>>
>> Here's the release candidate:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc1/
>>
>> Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Vote to close on Monday if it gets that far.
>>
>> There is an open issue in JIRA currently:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-69
>>
>> I'm keeping it open for a little bit longer in case anyone has any
>> opinions on my fix to this.
>>
>> Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
