Henri Yandell wrote:
On 2/8/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
>
> Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Vote to close on Saturday if it gets that far.
DateFormatUtils.testLang312 still fail for me, now at the last assert:
=========== %<================
Testsuite: org.apache.commons.lang.time.TimeTestSuite
Tests run: 62, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 11,174 sec
------------- Standard Output ---------------
WARNING: JDK test failed - testLang312()
------------- ---------------- ---------------
Testcase: testLang312(org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateFormatUtilsTest):
FAILED
expected:<...9...> but was:<...8...>
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...9...> but was:<...8...>
at org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateFormatUtilsTest.testLang31
(DateFormatUtilsTest.java:238)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
=========== %<================
It seems that we cannot format correctly also if the JDK fails. :-/
Ack :(
What kind of environment are you in? timezone/platform/jdk version/locale?
Same here
GMT+1/Windows XP/1.4.2_13 and 1.5.0_09/sv_SE
<snip/>
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
