[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ebourg
Date: Tue May 22 05:37:13 2007
New Revision: 540562

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=540562
Log:
Added a test case for saving a configuration to a web server using a PUT 
request (CONFIGURATION-249)
Minor code simplification in AbstractFileConfiguration

Modified:
    jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/project.xml
    
jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/AbstractFileConfiguration.java
    
jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration/TestPropertiesConfiguration.java

Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/project.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/project.xml?view=diff&rev=540562&r1=540561&r2=540562
==============================================================================
--- jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/project.xml (original)
+++ jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/project.xml Tue May 22 05:37:13 
2007
@@ -418,6 +418,26 @@
     </dependency>
<dependency>
+      <groupId>jetty</groupId>
+      <artifactId>jetty</artifactId>
+      <version>6.0.2</version>
+      <properties>
+        <scope>test</scope>
+      </properties>
+    </dependency>
+
+    <dependency>
+      <groupId>jetty</groupId>
+      <artifactId>jetty-util</artifactId>
+      <version>6.0.2</version>
+      <properties>
+        <scope>test</scope>
+      </properties>
+    </dependency>

The new dependencies again cause the build under JDK 1.3 to fail because of a wrong class version.

Are these additional dependencies really necessary? Okay, they are used for testing only, but maybe it would be good to keep the length of our dependency list (at least somewhat) limited.

Oliver

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to