Hi Pete-- I could be interested in being the Jakarta commons conduit for a revival of the functor code. According to the jakarta website, "A revival of a Commons Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on the commons developers mailing list." Is there a general feeling on-list as to whether the vote should be held, or any thoughts on why the revival of [functor] would be ill-advised?
-Matt --- Pete Aykroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not really sure how this is done but over the > past year and a half > or so, I've been working one of the original functor > contributors, > Jason Horman, on a branch of functor and we've made > a lot of progress > with it. For example, it's updated to take advantage > of generics which > is extremely helpful and also have done a lot work > developing > compilers that allows you to translate expressions > into runtime > functions, etc. This has been extremely useful for > us on our project > and we'd like to get this code back into the main > branch. > > I've emailed Rodney Waldhoff, who is listed as the > project lead for > functor but haven't heard back. There's been no > progress on functor > since 2005 and I don't want to step on toes, but I'm > also interested > in contributing to the community. > > Any pointers on what can be done would be > appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Pete > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
