Phil Steitz <phil.steitz <at> gmail.com> writes:

> a) no source, binary or semantic incompatibilities or deprecations
> introduced in a x.y.z release

I really wonder what's the problem with deprecations since they don't have any
influence on compatibility. I'd guess there is always a reason for deprecating
something. Not doing so despite that reason is most careless IMO since you
encourage users to use that commons' code despite knowing better that it is a
bad choice regarding future compatibility of the user's code.

Joerg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to