On 6/13/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Theres too much on the CLIRR report IMO for this to be a bug fix
> > release - I'm not that familiar with CLI but most (all?) don't seem
> > necessary for this 1.1 release
>
> It is a minor, rather than bugfix. So I think it's fair to say "Please
> recompile". However, also good to keep backwards compat when it's not
> too painful.
-1 to the principle, and thus -1 to the release as is. See the versioning
thread for more details.
Given all the agreement on the other thread....
*sulks like a 2 year old*
Time to figure out the history of these changes then. Looks like Brian
and Ben have got the clone one moving along. Fields will be easy to
put back. The interface will be weird.
However.... the addValue is still one that I think needs to be
considered as a special case. People should NOT use that method. It
screws things up.
We could keep the public method and change it to throw a
RuntimeException of some kind; and then use a package private method
with a different name. How does that sound?
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
