On 7/14/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I understood Henri correctly, his proposal is to distribute one artifact with optional collection dependencies. True? If so, I am for it. I don't see any technical advantage in creating collection-free or collection-only jars.
I was around (just) when 1.7.0 was released but I have no recollection of the decisions made on packaging. I believe the "bean-collections" related bean stuff came originally from commons collections - so I presume this allows people to continue to use these classes wihout taking on the whole of beanutils - and for the bean-collections free version - assures people there are no other dependencies. Anyway the main reason to continue to provide them is so anyone who has chosen to use them can continue to do so. Niall
On 7/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/14/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > BeanUtils is getting close to being ready for a 1.8.0 release IMO > > > (under 10 issues left targeted for 1.8.0). > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS > > > > > > One thought I had was to do a 1.8.0 Beta release first to (hopefully) > > > get wider testing - thoughts/opinions on that welcome. > > > > Niall, I saw a couple of commits suggesting a Maven 2 site. Are you > > aiming for that? If so I could go through it, if you want me to. > > Hi Dennis, > > Yes, I'm aiming to use m2 for the release ATM - just need to decide on > Henri's project structure suggestion to finish up on it. Any help / > suggestions would be much appreciated - thanks. > > Niall > > > -- > > Dennis Lundberg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
