-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
+1 .. couldn't agree with you more Best, Sanka Eran Chinthaka wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a slight problem with SNAPSHOT dependencies. > > Consider the two points. > > 1. When other projects depend on SNAPSHOTs, that means they are > working against the current working head of the project. So they do > not worry abt the version of the SNAPSHOT jar they are using. 2. > With the current state, say policy was in 0.90-SNAPSHOT state. > After the 0.9 release, policy-0.90-SNAPSHOT was not available > (which is fine), and was named to policy-0.92-SNAPSHOT.jar. This > cause problems to dependent projects. > > So due to above reasons, I feel putting the version number in to > the SNAPSHOT jar is not a good idea at all. So I'd like propose not > to put the version number with any of the commons projects jars. > For example, the latest policy jar will be policy-SNAPSHOT.jar. > > What do you all think ? > > -- Chinthaka > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEEFCS/Hd0ETKdgNIRAuJ+AJ0Ys7PHiKLn65ElMVGuKDp0tUKvcwCdEFeL y7GuBvK14Asgqaq+HaiFrd4= =dQg5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
