Eran, In all fairness Dennis tried to raise this issue and came up with something a month ago and proposed it on list [1] and got no response at all. Actually, IMHO the current patch is *so* much better than what was described in [1]. Glen has already indicated his support [2], Dennis i assume would love to have it. And i think i like it too pending any issues may raise that are of technical nature (need your help in finding any!). As a release manager, you have the authority to yank any patches [3] But please see this link as well [4] and please remember the RC was not really technically a release. Given that at least 2 use cases are supported (Jibx databinding and [5]), *PLEASE* review the changes from just technical point of view, so that we can fix it and move on.
thanks, dims [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114367541719948&w=2 [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-commons-dev/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/199911.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200508.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [5] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-483 On 4/21/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > Eran, > > Could you please review the test case, the code and let us know where > > there could be likely problems. Am sure we can count on dennis to help > > tweak the code. Yes, this is kind of late to do this, but i think we'd > > be better off with this than without it. > > I'm ok with this change, IFF we can release Axiom 1.0 with this change > before Axis2 1.0. > > I do not exactly know the policy of releasing RC and releasing the > proper one after that. Yes, I didn't put a code freeze but what I feel > is once you have an RC, you can not do major surgeries to the code. > Basically IMHO RC is for the people to review it during that period. > > So if you all people there agrees to release Axiom 1.0, with Dennis' > changes, by the end of next week according to the release plan we all > agreed, I'm ok with that. > > BTW, do others need some time to see what Dennis has proposed ? > > > -- Chinthaka > > P.S. BTW, the subject of this email is no longer valid :). > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
