[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-19?page=comments#action_12378102 
] 

Sanka Samaranayake commented on WSCOMMONS-19:
---------------------------------------------


I've applied the patch. Please verify whether required changes are properly 
applied so that I can close this issue 

> Normalization processing of ExactlyOne operator is not complient with the 
> ws-policy specification
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: WSCOMMONS-19
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-19
>      Project: WS-Commons
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Policy
>     Reporter: Paul Nolan
>     Priority: Critical
>  Attachments: WS-COMMONS-19.zip
>
> The processing of ExactlyOne operators during normalization is incorrect if 
> there are more than 2. An easy way to illustrate this is to look at this 
> example.
> <wsp:Policy 
>       xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy"; 
>       xmlns:tst="http://sample.org/Assertions";>
>   <tst:A wsp:Optional="true">A</tst:A>
>   <tst:B wsp:Optional="true">B</tst:B>
>   <tst:C wsp:Optional="true">C</tst:C>
> </wsp:Policy>
> This example has no ExactlyOnes in it. However during normalization the 
> optionals are converted to  ExactlyOnes.  The processing of these three 
> ExactlyOnes is performed in a nested loop. The resulting Policy has several 
> duplicate Alternatives and more importantly has the Alternative with all 
> three Assertions missing.If you were to add an additional optional Assertion 
> to the above example you would get even more missing Alternatives. The cross 
> producing of these ExactlyOnes should be carried out recursively. I have 
> produced a patch with the cross product code.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to