On 02/03/07, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeremy, Sorry for the delay, Well really the reason behind putting up this proposal is to ultimately use it in woden (and ofcourse I got the
great!
inspiration from WSDL4J and Woden extension registries) :) So if we
Take a look at the Woden extension registration. It's moved on a bit since WSDL4J. e.g. XMLElement is used to abstract away from DOMElement and OMElement
can factor something out it would be great. However I believe that Woden have the flexibility to have different XML schema models (say may be a plain DOM model). To keep it that way may be we should allow each model have its own way of handling extensions ?
I think we can develop a common extension mechanism which is generalised across DOM and OM. Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
