Sorry, forgot to provide a test case: http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In 1.4.1 it's an empty string. regards, John Kaputin. On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results > for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed > successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to > be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In > 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a > null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "". > This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing > the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't > think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any > XmlSchema devs shed more light on this? > > thanks, > John Kaputin. > > On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 from me too. > > > > Thanks, > > Eran > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi dims: > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 > > > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden > > > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut > > Axis2 > > > > 1.4 FINAL. > > > > > > > > Sounds like a plan? > > > > > > > > > > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires. > > > > > > --Glen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >
