On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:15 +0530, Saliya Ekanayake wrote: > Hi Thorsten (now I know how to greet in Spanish :) ),
hehe, glad to hear. ;) > This is interesting ;) Isn't it. > Theoretically XPath should work no matter how the OM > tree is built. I will look into this and reply to you ASAP. I opened an issue to keep track of this issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-388 Thanks for looking into this. salu2 > Regards, > Saliya > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Thorsten Scherler < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:53 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > I wonder - reading your other answers - whether AXIOMXPath is only > > > working with OM's that a builder has generated (parsing a file) and > > > not > > > like I do an OMElement that I created from the factory (without > > > parsing > > > a file), hence builder = null. > > > > I did a small test where I created a file and used it instead the former > > approach to create the OMElement via the factory and this revealed that > > above suspicion is right. The objects are identically besides the > > builder which seems to make all the difference. > > > > If you create a model directly from a factory and not a builder > > AXIOMXPath will not return you any node. > > > > Is this a bug? > > > > salu2 > > -- > > Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org > > Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions > > > > > > -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
