Ruwan,

If we can eliminate the parent module in a clean way, I'm in favor of it. In the meantime, I restored it so that the code can be built correctly. Please also note that the parent POM contains some metadata (mailing lists, dev team, etc.) that should be moved to the axis2- transports POM before we remove the parent module.

I noticed that the Geronimo project uses maven-shade-plugin to build the kind of uber-JAR we are looking for. Maybe this works better with OSGi?

Andreas


On 7 oct. 08, at 17:33, Ruwan Linton wrote:

Hhhhmmmm :( I am sorry, you are correct it was building for me because it is
on my local maven repo.

I saw you have reverted the parent module, but I still think we should be
able to get rid of this and make the root pom as the parent pom.

Any way the current strategy of building the complete jar is not gonna work for the OSGi bundle generation. I will have a look at this and get back.

Thanks,
Ruwan

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Andreas Veithen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

As the name implies the parent POM is the parent of all other modules
(except the POM in the root directory), so it's not at all obsolete and you should not remove it. If you are still able to build the transports after removing this, it is only because this parent POM is still available from
your local (or some other) repository! Can you please revert this?

Andreas

Ruwan Linton wrote:

Hi devs,

I had a look at the current maven build of the transports and realized
that
the complete axis2-transports.jar is generated from the root pom but there
is an obsolete module also to do the same but is not doing anything.
Therefore I removed that. Andreas, I hope this ok from the tests reports
point of view as well.

At the same time for the moment this complete transports jar is generated with out the jar plugin and we will need to change the way we build this
jar
in order to produce an OSGi bundle jar (but not just a jar). Hope it is
OK.

Thanks,
Ruwan







--
Ruwan Linton
http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to