keith chapman wrote: > -1 (binding) > > As the discussion shows we are clearly not ready yet. What is your definition for ready ? do you think any project which graduated as TLPs were ready ? . Not only that we can find a number of project which are in TLP still not ready (compared to Axis2 ). Honestly I do not know the Apache policy for graduating a project as TLP , specially what level of ready they are looking for. If we wait till project to be get ready before moving to TLP I am sure Apache will not have any of the TLPs.
And if you vote based on that (ready or not ready) I know you will never +1 for Axis2 as TLP. > I guess making Axis2 a > TLP at the moment will just increase the complexity than giving any added > value. > I do not understand this , do you think after we move Axiom , rampart and Neethi from Axis2 to WS complexity increased ? of course not. More and more people started to use Axiom and Neethi after that. I think even ODE will not use Axiom unless we move that as a TLP in WS (top level subproject in WS). Thank you! Deepal > Thanks, > Keith. > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Folks: >> >> Discussion seems to have died down about the TLP proposal, and I think we >> heard a lot of valuable viewpoints during the conversation. At this point, >> I think it's time to VOTE on the idea and see where we're at. >> >> I've described what we're voting on on the wiki page [1], and will include >> it here as well: >> >> * Restructure Axis2 as an independent TLP, containing subprojects that >> *directly* relate to Axis2 - these include all the Modules and Transports. >> This ends up being a reasonably sized and well-focused project. >> >> * Once Axis2 is split out, we'll move the "sub-sub-projects" inside >> WS-Commons (Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema) up to be WS subprojects. This will >> also involve making sure that the SVN authorizations are appropriately >> granular. >> >> * We'll then do a review of the remaining projects inside WS and based on >> that, decide whether any further action is needed. Such actions might >> include promoting more projects to TLPs, or retiring stagnant codebases. >> >> Please chime in with your VOTE on this (and indicate binding/non-binding >> depending on whether you are a PMC member). >> >> Here's my +1 (binding). >> >> Thanks, >> --Glen >> >> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Proposals/Axis2TLPProposal >> >> > > > > -- Thank you! http://blogs.deepal.org
