2008/12/3 Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wednesday 03 December 2008 8:51:06 am Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> James, >> >> Please add a new JIRA for the mutator method. There was another email >> a day or two ago from jarek about a release for axiom and neethi. if >> there are enough push, we may get there sooner. > > Does Neethi even need to be released? An svn log on the src directory shows > no changes at all since the last release. > > Dan > > >> >> -- dims >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:42 AM, James Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Are there any planned dates for a new release? >> > >> > I'm currently using 1.2.6 and I've got a problem that was partially >> > addressed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-300, and >> > then more fully addressed in revision 659096 >> > "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=659096"; (doesn't seem >> > to be a JIRA ticket for that change?). Processing text nodes in the >> > document causes a lot of IllegalArgumentExceptions to the thrown doing >> > reader.getProperty(). >> > >> > For now, I can work around this by explicitly setting the >> > isDataHandlerAwareField of StAXOMBuilder to Boolean.FALSE, but that >> > feels a little dirty. >> > >> > XMLStreamReader parser = >> > XMLInputFactory.newInstance().createXMLStreamReader(in); >> > StAXOMBuilder builder = new StAXOMBuilder(parser) { >> > { >> > this.isDataHandlerAware = Boolean.FALSE; >> > } >> > }; >> > >> > My own preference for that API would be to have a mutator method >> > rather than modifying a protected field. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > James > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dankulp.com/blog >
Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-406 Patch attached to the issue. Cheers, James
