On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 22:27 +0100, Andreas Veithen wrote: > Thorsten, > > I updated the Axiom dependencies to point to the (recently released) > 1.6 version of geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec. I believe this should solve > the mail issue (at least the issues we saw in the Axis2 mail transport > are solved in that version). Note that this JAR only contains the > JavaMail API, but no providers. That means that even if both > Geronimo's and Sun's implementations are on the classpath, there > should be no problem. > > I also added an entry in the FAQ section of the Axiom site discussing > the JAF/JavaMail issue. > > All this will be available/published with the next Axiom release. >
Thank you very much Andreas, that is fantastic news. I will try it out ASAP. salu2 > Regards, > > Andreas > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 13:40, Thorsten Scherler > <thorsten.scherler....@juntadeandalucia.es> wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:11 +0100, Andreas Veithen wrote: > >> Thorsten, > >> > >> Axiom requires the Java Activation Framework and JavaMail API, and it > >> declares the Geronimo implementations as dependencies. If you want > >> Sun's implementations, then indeed you need to exclude these > >> dependencies, but at the same time you need to make sure that your > >> project depends (directly or transitively) on the corresponding > >> artifacts. Note that there has been a discussion [1] about which > >> implementations should be used by Axiom, but there is no consensus. > >> > > > > Thanks Andreas for pointing out the issue. The only thing that I do not > > get is that AXIOM is for me about creating a OM for stax. I understand > > dependencies for StAX but not for mail/activation. In my use case I need > > AXIOM to create an object model and here I do not need mail/activation > > at all. > > > > To wrapping up and add my 2 cents to the discussion WSCOMMONS-417 it was > > quite time intensive to find out that an Axiom dependency caused that > > our mails failed. Meaning as long as Geronimo does not work as expected > > and we cannot ship with sun we should at least add a BIG HEADSUP that > > using AXIOM out of the box may cause the side effect that mailing may > > fail if not used with suns libs. > > > > salu2 > > > >> Andreas > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-417 > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:57, Thorsten Scherler > >> <thorsten.scherler....@juntadeandalucia.es> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 11:29 +0100, Javier Puerto wrote: > >> >> I have changed the dependency in the pom to look like this: > >> >> <dependency> > >> >> <groupId>org.apache.ws.commons.axiom</groupId> > >> >> <artifactId>axiom-impl</artifactId> > >> >> <version>1.2.6</version> > >> >> <exclusions> > >> >> <exclusion> > >> >> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> > >> >> <artifactId>geronimo-activation_1.1_spec</artifactId> > >> >> </exclusion> > >> >> <exclusion> > >> >> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> > >> >> <artifactId>geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec</artifactId> > >> >> </exclusion> > >> >> </exclusions> > >> >> </dependency> > >> > > >> > Actually that makes me wonder why this are dependencies for AXIOM to > >> > start with? Do we really need this dependencies for axiom, or is it save > >> > to just exclude them? > >> > > >> > salu2 > >> > -- > >> > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> > >> > Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions> > >> > > >> > Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad > >> > de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > -- > > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> > > Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions> > > > > Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad > > de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI) > > > > > > > > > > -- Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions> Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
