+1 Sounds good. Andreas
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 16:49, Daniel Kulp<dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > Some of you have noticed some discussions on WSCOMMONS-299. I've also been > thinking about some of those issues and I DID have a discussion with Glen > Daniels at TSSJS about the possibility of starting work on a Neethi 3.0. > With the comments and stuff on WSCOMMONS-299, it might be time to really start > it. Thus, I'd like to "svn cp" the trunk to a 2.x branch for future > maintenance and start making trunk 3.0. > > Things I'd like tackled for 3.0: > > 1) Java 5 - make the collections and everything typed. Use Enums where > appropriate, etc.... Basically, general cleanup. Also, I see that many > operations aren't threadsafe due to use of HashMap's with no synchronization. > Possibly fix those with ConcurrentHashMaps or similar. > > 2) Better support for the nested policies as described in WSCOMMONS-299. > > 3) Change the builders to use XMLStreamReader. The Policies use > XMLStreamWriter. For consistency, using the reader is preferred. This also > removes Axiom as a dependency making the requirement list smaller. > > 4) With (3) fixed, most of the Neethi "fork" we have in CXF can be ported > back. CXF has a few utilities and such that would be good to push back and > then remove from CXF. > > 5) Once all of that is done, it would open up the door to allow some more > "common" Policies objects for standard policies. Some could be in Neethi > directly (things like policies objects for WS-Addressing assertions, mtom > stuff, etc...). Others, like the WS-SecurityPolicy stuff could either go > into Neethi or might be better in WSS4J. This could help eliminate a BUNCH > of duplicate code between users of Neethi, particularly CXF and Rampart. > (maybe if I keep pushing similar code down into commons, we can have a big > merger in the future. Acxfis 3? Maybe not. :-) ) > > 6) Support for WS-Policy 1.5. > > Anyway, if no one really objects to starting the 3.0 work, I'd like to create > the 2.x branch later this week. Thoughts? > > BTW: This is also why I STRONGLY am in favor of Neethi staying in commons and > not going to an Axis2 TLP. > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
