David Crossley wrote, On 08/02/2003 6.30:
>Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some time back. would it be ok?
In the previous discussion, we said that we did not like the idea of an empty <xml-commons/> element.
You had another example where the <xml-commons> element was a container for the pipe - i really liked the symbolism of that. Gathering on the commons.
Ah, sorry, I just remembered
>>Is there room to squeeze in an outer <apache> element?
and forgot of the rest, my bad.
The fact is that It becomes really big, so I put the tag on the logo to make it part of it... I've put here [1] other two versions, see if they are better.
<slightly-embarrassed> Sorry again, I did not mean to ditch the previous decisions. </slightly-embarrassed>
[1] http://cvs.apache.org/~nicolaken/xml-commons.html
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------