Shane Curcuru wrote: > Guys, you two ROCK! These look great. > > David - I'd say +1 to going live anytime you have time. This is far better > than the cheesy structure I put on the website long ago. Any nits can be > picked at later.
Well +1 from me then too. I have overcome many of the issues that we had. There are still a few license issues, but not too bad. The new structure is still not ideal, but one step further. If i don't hear any objections soon then i will go ahead. > (For some reason, the nicely curved bottom border of the > search area has an extra square bar of light blue under it) Not sure. Damn the frilly bits. Seriously, i try to work it out. > And any hints on how to rebuild the site... oh, I see they're in there > already. Great! :-) I also have a build.txt description that i will commit to cvs or perhaps i should just merge it into that howto web page. We'll see. > Nicola - my +1 is for the first one: xml-commons-logo.gif No need to try > to stuff the graphics inside the <xml-isims>, just let it be a background. That is interesting. The last time Nicola Ken presented the logos, i said that i did not like the idea of the empty xml-commons element and i loved the concept of a peace-pipe inside the commons. Oh dear, what a dilemma - they are all good. How about i toss a coin? We can always change it. > - Shane > (Mightily inspired to make some releases and move stuff to mirrored distros!) I had better hurry then, to maintain momentum. --David > ---- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---- > > David Crossley wrote, On 05/09/2003 5.14: > > > > > Okay i have updated the draft website. > > > > > > I do not want any google links to this draft, so please go to > > > http://www.apache.org/ > > > then go to ~crossley/commons-draft/ > > > > For the possible logos: > > > > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/logos/xml-commons.html
